Rayy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 272 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More stockings please – Anyone agree??? #15398

    Rayy
    Member

    yep,

    wierd thing is that I *hate* pantyhose / tights but am very partial to stockings πŸ™‚

    Wouldn’t want to see the overuse of stockings they’re a good source of the variety that RE balances so well.

    M

    in reply to: Set: "Hiding the Handcuffs" #15340

    Rayy
    Member

    @hywel wrote:

    Have you tried using it on images with a model, Merlin? I’m worried that she’d have to stay preternaturally still for the series of exposures.

    actually no, mainly architecture to be honest..

    You’d probably need a static model and a tripod for a good bracketing, however, I find I get reasonable results by simply processing the same raw 3 times, i.e. one +0ev and +1 / -1 to give a set for mapping..

    Will give it a try..

    M

    in reply to: Best Games. #15375

    Rayy
    Member

    @KateTT wrote:

    I am sure we all have the imagination and creativity to bend this thread round to the dark side though

    I’m not sure I have, πŸ™ at least not that I can include a glamorous female bondagette in. Still, if you want a storyline whereby a parasitic spammer ba$tard gets beaten with a rusty shovel – I’m yer man! πŸ˜€

    Cheers

    M

    in reply to: Set: "Hiding the Handcuffs" #15338

    Rayy
    Member

    @hywel wrote:

    and use some HDR software to tone map it-

    I regularly use Photomatrix Pro and its well worth the $$ there’s also a free version which watermarks your images.

    ..just thought I’d mention it..

    M

    in reply to: Bondage Awards #15318

    Rayy
    Member

    .. obviously these awards take place in Vegas, right.?.

    No references to the “queen” Ariel thing.. think we may have finally seen the last of such nonsense πŸ™‚ πŸ™„ πŸ™‚

    Well done AA

    M

    in reply to: Wild Swedish Tree-Girl #15365

    Rayy
    Member

    LOL I’d forgotten about this set πŸ™‚

    Ariels position made rigging a bit life-and-death for us both but Hywel was keeping a eye us and I’m sure he would have pulled the plug if he saw something uber-stupid happening. What I remember as difficult wasn’t the rigging or Ariels tree bark issue it was simply standing up and shooting.. As a growing number of members have realised there’s alot of concentration goes into the lighting and shooting and in the studio its easy to walk backwards into/over stuff with the camera to your eye as you hunt for the light or angle, this is even more so on location. In *this* case we’ve had to decend the part vertical side of a wooded ravine to get to this spot and as I move around shooting I’m literally jumping/hoping/staggering from smooth boulder to boulder in the midst of a flowing stream carrying $$$ of camera equipment. Shots were taken while doing the splits/standing on one leg/falling backwards..

    Yeah, some wider contextual shots would have been nice, I could say I couldn’t phisically get to such a position or the light failed but its more likely I forgot.. πŸ˜‰

    Don’t remember the battery issue, I’m sure it happened tho – of course spares would be no further than my camera bag its just that in this case *getting* to my bag (<30m?) took alot of time and effort, sorry Ariel.. 😳

    Spectators were very very very unlikely.. although saying that we made that mistake a couple of times..

    Glad this set turned out so well, very Ariel Anderssen.. πŸ˜€

    M

    in reply to: Best Games. #15370

    Rayy
    Member

    W T F ??

    πŸ‘Ώ

    in reply to: Members’ chat 28th May 8 pm #15351

    Rayy
    Member

    πŸ™ πŸ™„ πŸ™

    ..I’m guessing at 8pm on my birthday I’ll have other things to do..

    bah!

    in reply to: New Sophia Video #15285

    Rayy
    Member

    yay!

    Very nice work Steve!! πŸ˜€

    I was about to email but this seems an even better place to say so, keep up the good work fella. Hope all other bondage sites out there take a good look at how high the bar is.. πŸ˜†

    Look forward to seeing more, esp Ariels video “project” shot the same day which I’ve still no clue about but I’m pretty sure will be geat πŸ˜‰

    M

    in reply to: New camera for RE? Roadtest results #15221

    Rayy
    Member

    Steve’s right, this is a tough one..

    I’ve been debating this to myself for days and still don’t have absolute conviction in this but here goes.

    Basic problem here then is that, shockingly, an old 5D with a hundred thousand shots to its name and a £200 lens is performing 99% as well as the Hasslblah.. costing the same as a family car. 😯 Sounds like a no brainer thus far..

    For my penneth, it comes down to what you want to do over the next couple of years Hywel, if your photography is going to be presented in jpeg then the Hazlebled makes zero sense. If, on the other hand you’ve a secret desire to publish photography of some kind in print then it makes more sense. Sure there are differences in the shots above but i’ve got 2 monitors and a laptop on my desk and the differences between those screens are huge compared to the differences between the 2 camera outputs above.

    Above is a nice comparison between the Hashisbad and the 5D but as Steve says it would now be really nice to see a similar comparison between the 5D(I) and 5D(II) and for a negative control why not include the 40D too?

    Funny thing is, although there’s no logical reason for buying the Hooverbag I still want one. I bet Steve does too and having just re-read your review you obviously do to Hywel πŸ™‚ so you could just bugger logic and reason and splurge, its either the Hokeybed or the tax man at the end of the day.

    Good luck

    M

    in reply to: New camera for RE? Roadtest results #15220

    Rayy
    Member

    Steve’s right, this is a tough one..

    I’ve been debating this to myself for days and still don’t have absolute conviction in this but here goes.

    Basic problem here then is that, shockingly, an old 5D with a hundred thousand shots to its name and a £200 lens is performing 99% as well as the Hasslblah.. costing the same as a family car. 😯 Sounds like a no brainer thus far..

    For my penneth, it comes down to what you want to do over the next couple of years Hywel, if your photography is going to be presented in jpeg then the Hazlebled makes zero sense. If, on the other hand you’ve a secret desire to publish photography of some kind in print then it makes more sense. Sure there are differences in the shots above but i’ve got 2 monitors and a laptop on my desk and the differences between those screens are huge compared to the differences between the 2 camera outputs above.

    Above is a nice comparison between the Hashisbad and the 5D but as Steve says it would now be really nice to see a similar comparison between the 5D(I) and 5D(II) and for a negative control why not include the 40D too?

    Funny thing is, although there’s no logical reason for buying the Hooverbag I still want one. I bet Steve does too and having just re-read your review you obviously do to Hywel πŸ™‚ so you could just bugger logic and reason and splurge, its either the Hokeybed or the tax man at the end of the day.

    Good luck

    M

    in reply to: New camera for RE? Roadtest results #15219

    Rayy
    Member

    Steve’s right, this is a tough one..

    I’ve been debating this to myself for days and still don’t have absolute conviction in this but here goes.

    Basic problem here then is that, shockingly, an old 5D with a hundred thousand shots to its name and a £200 lens is performing 99% as well as the Hasslblah.. costing the same as a family car. 😯 Sounds like a no brainer thus far..

    For my penneth, it comes down to what you want to do over the next couple of years Hywel, if your photography is going to be presented in jpeg then the Hazlebled makes zero sense. If, on the other hand you’ve a secret desire to publish photography of some kind in print then it makes more sense. Sure there are differences in the shots above but i’ve got 2 monitors and a laptop on my desk and the differences between those screens are huge compared to the differences between the 2 camera outputs above.

    Above is a nice comparison between the Hashisbad and the 5D but as Steve says it would now be really nice to see a similar comparison between the 5D(I) and 5D(II) and for a negative control why not include the 40D too?

    Funny thing is, although there’s no logical reason for buying the Hooverbag I still want one. I bet Steve does too and having just re-read your review you obviously do to Hywel πŸ™‚ so you could just bugger logic and reason and splurge, its either the Hokeybed or the tax man at the end of the day.

    Good luck

    M

    in reply to: February previews #15136

    Rayy
    Member

    Ooh it’s easy to think of the Sweden trip as a long way to go and a big expense, but then you see that shot of Ariel on the wooden jetty or the one in the boat and it seems sooo worthwhile! 😯

    Oh yeah, my camerawork and Kates rigging on the Sophia set, my/our first proper outdoor set and the one in which I learnt never to put a model in both sun and shade. Every time Sophia put an arm up, head back or foot out it immediately overexposed in the sun πŸ‘Ώ I think it took us about half an our before we figured we could just move Sophia back into the shade about 2ft and then no more problem, doh! πŸ™„

    Cheers

    M

    in reply to: Sorry for being AWOL #15027

    Rayy
    Member

    πŸ™‚ A great way to spend a Saturday! Many thanks to all there. πŸ˜›

    Particularly looking forward to seeing Sophia’s (very brave) shower scene 😈 😈 and maybe the drawer-cam results too πŸ˜† 😯

    Great stuff!

    M

    in reply to: Ariel Tree Suspension #14987

    Rayy
    Member

    Lies. My eyes are actually much more bloodshot than this..

    And can the world please note that I have resisted the huge temptation to post a picture of Big Bird.. πŸ˜‰

    Memorable set tho, I wasn’t even with the unit that produced this but that evening before the set was previewed to a surprised Hywel I remember there was a definate air of “are we going to get in the sh#t for doing such a *risky* rig..” floating around πŸ˜‰ Ahh happy days.. πŸ™‚

    M

    in reply to: Doing this at home… bondage safety #14940

    Rayy
    Member

    Aww Kate.. you know i was just trying to make you feel a bit guilty.. πŸ˜›

    Made me laugh

    M

    in reply to: Lady of the Fey #14965

    Rayy
    Member

    @steve wrote:

    Retrained Elegance’s high quality.

    heheh thanks Steve, needed a smile.. πŸ˜€

    cheers
    @steve wrote:

    Marlin

    πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Photo tutorial samples 15/11/2008 #14943

    Rayy
    Member

    Oh Cav.. πŸ™„

    ..there’s me thinking you were going to be super-mean to Ariel.. πŸ˜‰ Glad nobody got the Christmas tree out for a background prop!

    Barbie idea is a cracker tho! πŸ˜€

    Interesting stuff, well done to all involved.

    M

    in reply to: Lady of the Fey #14959

    Rayy
    Member

    Hi all!

    Potentially an interesting point of view but horribly put Curious1..

    Of course you can say you think there should be more angles and a poor choice of gag but please respect the effort thats gone into this by doing so a little more constructively. For instance, did it occur there might be a good reason for the narrow choice of angles? I didn’t shoot this and I’m certain Svampen doesn’t need me to defend this but here’s the more obvious reasons from someone who knows a little about what it took to shoot this.

    – the rocks a big, covered in lichens etc, vertical drops all around and in the middle of nowhere. It would be pretty stupid to risk breaking your equipment or worse, your legs freeclimbing them to get the shot from above.

    – the guys doing the tutorial at the weekend will now know some of the complexity of studio lighting. Its waaay more difficult outdoors, in the woods as the sun is at its lowest is the most difficult I can think of. You can’t just turn the sun down a stop or move a couple of trees to free up some shadow. Look behind Pling and you can see the sheer range of light to shadow varying EVERYWHERE as the light fights its way through the trees – there’s simply no consistancy. This means every time your model moves slightly the light/shadow falling on her face changes completely and you’re continually stopping to re-meter the correct exposure. Add to this every time the photographer moves his angle to the light source changes and may need metering again plus you’re fighting lens flare etc etc. PLUS, lets not forget that even if nobody moves then the low sun will itself move quite quickly which means the shadows through the trees swing across minute by minute and you rapidly loose your levels. I’m impressed there’s as many well exposed shots as there is to be honest, a compact camera in these conditions would not do justice to Restrained Elegance.

    – Shooting in relatively low light and without ramping up the ISO needs a v expensive lens, alternatively you can get potentially even better shots using a prime lens (a non – zoom) which is the norm at RE. Downside is the photographer has to keep moving instead of zooming, don’t know if Svampen was able to use his zoom or not but having to use a prime would limit the choice of shot and generally slow the shoot down as he tries not to get hurt scrambling about.

    – There’s a commercial reality here, often people comment similarly that a particular shot is missing or could have been improved but fail to realise that we’re not after a perfect shot – we need to get 50+ good shots, often to tell a story and battling with the light as detailed above. There’s a very finite time before your model gets frozen or suffers from the restriction of bondage so you don’t have much time at all to cover the angles, especially in the woods scrambling around on rock and trees in constantly varying light. Pretty soon you simply have to wrap the set, like it or not *that* shot you’d like to get from up on the rocks, up a tree, into the sun, from below, capturing the reflection etc etc isn’t feasible.

    Gags aren’t to everyones tastes, which is why they shot the first half of the set without one.

    Don’t remember if I gave this a 4 or a 5, I can’t help appreciate this set knowing how challenging it would be to this standard. Nice work guys.

    M

    in reply to: Doing this at home… bondage safety #14936

    Rayy
    Member

    πŸ™„

    in reply to: the man has talent #14912

    Rayy
    Member

    arrr.. you were very brave πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: sophiepeephole–jasmine4post #14880

    Rayy
    Member

    yay – glad this set has been so well received πŸ˜€

    As I remember this was an improvised set using the space and props available at the time. Some models out there could learn much from the way Sophia models within the confines of bondage. Nice work Sophia, very much looking forward to working with you next πŸ˜›

    M

    in reply to: Chat Sessions? #14904

    Rayy
    Member

    Great πŸ™‚

    Will certainly try but Saturday evenings are not ideal..

    See you all there. Probably.

    M

    in reply to: Doing this at home… bondage safety #14933

    Rayy
    Member

    πŸ™
    I was supposed to be at the studio to shoot the lovely Fi with Steve last week but couldn’t make it.. my heart’s broken, does that count?

    M
    πŸ˜‰


    Rayy
    Member

    Hi,

    Never thought of it before but I guess some gold cuffs could add a bit of glamour to RE, I bought some gold plated hiatts? years ago but the gold wore off very quickly at which time they just looked nasty. Although perhaps not as nasty as those blingy rhinestone things heheh..

    RE has a nice heavy set of combination chains in Ariels size but its just occured to me I’d quite like to see a more “Gorean” set as per “dreamstrike” “sirik” kinda stuff. *Almost* purely symbolic but still fully functional.. πŸ˜‰

    Cheers

    M

    in reply to: About those breasts #14832

    Rayy
    Member

    Hi all,

    Totally agree with the above, size is irrelevant as long they’re proportional to the body shape, for me I think obviously fake breasts is the biggest turn off possible.. Saying that do think some do look better than others and although its easy for me to say “what on earth do these girls think of themselves??” its perhaps a sad fact that in some areas of modelling and adult entertainment its practically a job requirement and therefore simply good business sense πŸ™ Each to their own..

    M

    in reply to: In Search of a Story #14756

    Rayy
    Member

    hmm, apologies in advance if I cheapen this thread..

    Err, no. Afraid every attempt at weaving a clever and sexy storyline basically starts and ends with a one liner.. So here goes πŸ˜‰

    .. wow.. just how *did* you know I’m wearing a matching set of undies.?..

    .. Sophia wasn’t just comfortable with being tied up – she could actually fall asleap ..

    .. does my bum look big in this ? ..

    .. The damn clock was so ugly Sophia just couldn’t bear to watch it any longer ..

    .. Sophia started to wonder if he really was a plumber ..

    Best I can do for now,

    Cheers

    M

    in reply to: Spanking – thumbs up or thumbs down? #14769

    Rayy
    Member

    Hi all,

    Interesting stuff.. I guess I’d have to be in the thumbs up camp although with the caveats that CD and Fogane mention. Saying that, pure spanking / CP for the sake of it does nothing for me even if the enjoyment of the “bottom” (lol) is apparent, similarly I always view the masses of spanked school/college girl sets with unease – guess its just a *bit* too close to the paedo world for me.

    Think I may have a slightly slanted view to the majority of members in that I tend to view bondage as a tool of D/s instead of an entirely stand alone activity and so CP is then a further tool, perhaps of bondage. Anyway I digress, happy to see spanking & CP feature on RE as long as its tastefully done, SSC and in context of a bigger picture or storyline. Don’t think I would have been so happy a while ago but the dynamic of Hywel & Ariel coupled with Ariels well known enthusiasm somehow makes it enjoyable viewing. πŸ˜•

    Cheers

    Merlin

    in reply to: Bondage Photography Tutorial #14741

    Rayy
    Member

    .

    πŸ˜€ πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜€

    .

    in reply to: Bondage Photography Tutorial #14739

    Rayy
    Member

    Hey Cav!

    (I’m sure you’re still lurking out there.. must be due for a burst of posts πŸ™‚ )

    if you don’t do this one buddy then you’re probably gonna have some explaining to do to Ariel.. πŸ™„

    πŸ˜€

    Merlin

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 272 total)