At The Water’s Edge

Home Forums General Chat At The Water’s Edge

This topic contains 3 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 10 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10167

    Anonymous

    Not a bad photo set, but no where near as good as it could have been. Yes, it is beautiful scenery, and yes of course Ariel is an extremely beautiful woman, but why she is always clothed, “chastely” photographed, never nude, and with few closeups is beyond me. Such a waste.

    #16810

    Going to have to disagree on this one. It may be curious coincidence but just before checking out the Forum, my wife and I were commenting how much the outfit suited Ariel in this set. There are, of course, lots of nude sets of Ariel on the site. All the Norwegian ones may not be up at present but there is . .”Nude in Norway”. 🙂

    Andrew

    #16811

    aonurag
    Member

    I’ll have to agree with tfandrew (and his wife): I like the costume for this set, and there are already plenty of “Ariel in the buff” sets on the site. If anything, I’d want to see clothed sets – especially if the “clothing” is scanty-flimsy like it is in this set.

    Now the nude sets are more on the artistic side of “artistic vs explicit” – but that’s just fine with me. And they are more full-body shots than close-ups – but that’s just fine with me, too.

    #16812

    Anonymous

    OK, tfandrew and lurker, we will have to disagree. While I too like Ariel in costumes, I greatly prefer her nude. Such a magnificent body should not remain clothed (for long). I do however enjoy the variety of her various costumes, and, when it happens, how she escapes them, the dilemmas she endures and the poses their escape requires. Many of my favorite shots of her are clothed or are facial closeups.

    I should perhaps add that Ariel is probably the principal reason I am a member of RE. Yes, the site has many beautiful women, lovely, interesting and often quite unusual poses, as well as wonderful photos per se. But she is why I visit the site and when she remains too covered I am disappointed.

    As for “artistic vs. explicit”, lurker, I would also like to see somewhat more explicit shots than is average for the site. That does not mean I don’t like or want the artistic as well. For me, the ideal shoot has a progression of clothed to nude and artistic to explicit, all of them kept in a proper balance. I am definitely not looking for that level of continued, barnyard-like explicitness to which so many sites manage to sink. They become boring on their face. Rather I great prefer a progression, or at least a variation, from what might be called a “street view” to a fully intimate portrait of a lovely woman, ideally in a way that is teasing but in the end fulfilling.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

The forum ‘General Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.