Casino Royale – On a lighter note….

Home Forums General Chat Casino Royale – On a lighter note….

This topic contains 5 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  h2001appy 17 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9206

    ErickOGXKayq
    Member

    Hi;

    So finally the wait is over and Casino Royale has hit the screens. I went to see it on the opening weekend and have to say I am very seriously impressed. I have long been a fan of the whole Bond franchise and was horrified at that last Brosnan film (the invisible car should have been reason enough never to have released the rubbish) and I was therefore thoroughly impressed with Daniel Craig’s grittier, stripped down portrayal of Bond.

    Moreover, Eva Green as Vesper Lynd has to have been the best Bond girl in recent history. Not only is she beautiful, but we got to see her tied up (OK only very briefly and not very glamorously lying in the middle of a road) and frequently barefoot.

    Has anyone else seen it – what were your thoughts?

    Also isn’t it time we had a Bond-themed shoot (Thunderball and Live and Let Die both feature memorable bond-girl-in-peril scenes that you might consider recreating) for RE? Is that a tux in my wardrobe?

    CD

    #12312

    Allow me to introduce Miss Penny Sterling, secretary at M.I.6, being menaced by a slinky Australian super-spy…

    :;): 10th December, coming to a screen near you!

    I’ve done a few spy themes in the past, always been meaning to do it with a proper spy in a tux and a deathtrap for RE. Some of the Evil Magician props make good death-traps! I guess the closest I’ve come is actually:

    Evil Magician: Agent Doubledare

    no Bond figure, but Rob the Magician makes a very sinister Blofeld (complete with Mr. Tibbles, the sinister white cat…)

    On the new Bond and the new Bond film… I thought the film itself was entertaining enough, but wa a bit disappointed by how it was like looking at a “Hollywood 2000’s colouring book”. The cinematography and direction were SO by-the-numbers. Wobbly shaky-cam fight scenes? Check. Fashionable soap-opera nod towards character development? Check. All chase sequences at least 33% too long? Check. As far as the film-makers were concerned it seemed to be identical to every other Hollywood action movie stamped out in the production line in the last five or six years.

    I thought the plot was OK, it is a bit of a mangling of the book but given that the book was written fifty years ago that’s inevitable. The soap-opera character development was mildly excruciating, I think because it was shoe-horned in quite intrusively in places. Not as intrusively as the Sony product placement, mind you.

    As for Daniel Craig as the new Bond… I don’t think he looks the part the way Brosnan did, and his acting skills didn’t exactly get stretched, but he was OK. Sean Connery he ain’t, though.

    Completely agree that getting away from the invisible car silliness back to a bit of grit. The dreaded cheapo BMW’s thankfully ditched for two gorgeous Aston Martins. Although they needn’t have bothered as the cars really were also shoe-horned in as product placement.

    You know the one thing I really couldn’t help but notice? That loads of violence and a male torture sequence like that is acceptable in a 12-rated film, but if it had been Vesper Lynd being tortured on-screen we’d have been looking at 18 material. Sigh.

    It was fun, but not one to rush out and buy the DVD. Sin City, it wasn’t. At least the opening parkour chase scene on foot was excellent (although it should have been cut down to two thirds length as usual) and at least some of the girls were very prettily barefoot! :devil

    Cheers, Hywel.

    Edited By Hywel on 1164872493

    #12313

    ultranoirean
    Member

    Agree with Hywel on this one…cut down the length by a 1/3 and get rid of the long, drawn out lovey-dovey soap opera shit!!!

    #12314

    Yeh, what *IS* it with the modern obsession with soap-opera character development shit? The rot started in Star Trek: The Next Generation, where every episode had to have at least one or two characters mooning around whilst being patronised to death by the drippy ship’s councillor (to crying man… “I sense that you are feeling… upset”. Your awesome empath powers astound me…)

    Now it isn’t that I object to character development. It is the whole soap opera way of presenting it I hate. Character can be displayed and developed in a subtle, slick and unobtrusive way by how the character reacts to the events and the plot. It doesn’t need the addition of dozens of endless talking head scenes for the hard-of-thinking.

    Which reminds me- one thing I am guilty of in the RE videos is too much talk and not enough action to get across the story. It is largely the limitation of having to shoot the videos in a relatively short space of time with no detailed script and a very small or non-existant crew (which is also a reason why some of the improvised videos can turn out much more as comedies than originally intended- it is a lot easier to improvise comedy than dramatic tragedy I reckon).

    This is one of the aspects I wanted to work on in the film, which I promise honest-to-goodness I will have edited into a presentable cut in the New Year to show you what I mean. That’s one direction I would like to explore more next year, to expand the range of styles of videos we do. Watch this space!

    Cheers, Hywel.

    Edited By Hywel on 1164916247

    #12315

    Rayy
    Member

    Try and try again..

    Have been working away most of the week but at least this meant I could catch up with an old uni mate. Must be getting old as we decided to dispense with the usual drink-till-u-puke formalities and see Casino Royale instead, I’d been trying to get for a week. Off he went to get the tickets while I stocked up on overpriced food, then we watched Saw III for a couple of hours. Not what I was prepared for.

    O M G if anyone has been wondering what PD has been upto since Insex here’s your answer! I quite liked the first film and this is kinda more of the same as both a prequel and sequel. The plot is only apparent in post-film analysis as it is easily missed when staring openmouthed at the ribcage-bursting / exploding collars etc. And yes the unnecessary character devolopment is present and correct, even heavy issues such as self harm are shoehorned in for little reason, but that doesn’t really matter as I’d watch Shawnee Smith do anything. Infact I did.. :surprised

    I’ll probably catch Bond on tv in about 5 years or so.. anyone seen the Bettie Page movie?

    M

    #12316

    h2001appy
    Member

    Do NOT go and see “The Notorious Bettie Page”!!!!

    The is nothing wrong with the film per se….

    Except the missus has been new to this scene, and we have been watching some choice cinematography to put her at ease (Hywel, thanks for all the Chanta-Ariel scenes, the idle gossip and chit chat really made it seem relaxed)

    Well, Hywel’s work, films like “Secretary” etc…. Good.

    The Notorious Bettie Page…. Bad.

    Lets just say the end does not come across as very bondage friendly.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

The forum ‘General Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.