Random thoughts on DYI

Home Forums General Chat Random thoughts on DYI

This topic contains 0 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  aonurag 14 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9791

    aonurag
    Member

    o DYI isn’t just a British thing. In fact, it’s so much a US thing that I’m a bit surprised to hear that it’s also a British thing.

    o In the US, the DYI gods seem less demanding of blood sacrifices, possibly because we placate them with many large temples (aka “hardware stores” and “home improvement stores.”)

    o “Every project requires at least three trips to the hardware store” is an old piece of wisdom.

    o Many years as a working research chemist has given me a heightened but also warped sense of the hazards. Sounds like you have the same thing from your physics work. Yes, a good Safety Officer is priceless, and a bad one is priceless in a different way.

    === story floating around the internet ===
    Oh, boy.

    Now I have to explain the absolute Greatest Moment in Wacked Out Real Science.

    Couple years ago, some people I worked with finally completed a long-delayed
    project to build a very large vacuum chamber for testing plasma thrusters and
    other advanced spacecraft propulsion systems. Not the biggest in the business,
    but maybe top ten nationwide. Big enough to walk around inside, at any rate,
    which is the important point.

    Important, because in order to go operational it needed the approval of the
    local Safety Nazis. You know the type. They have a checklist, nay, a whole
    handbook of checklists, one of which involves Confined Spaces. Big enough
    to walk around in? Check. Airtight? Check. Can be filled with asphyxiant
    gas? Well, the MSDS for “Vacuum” apparently lists it as an “asphyxiant”, so
    check. It’s a Confined Space, and so the Confined Space checklist must be
    implemented.

    Issue the first: How do they make certain nobody can accidentally walk in while
    the chamber is full of that deadly asphyxiant, “vacuum”? No, the fifty *tons*
    of force holding the door closed, is not an acceptable answer.

    Issue the second: When the chamber is vented back to full atmospheric pressure,
    where does the vacuum go? If the chamber were accidentally vented by opening
    the door (see above, and note exact Safety Nazi quote, “OK, say if you were
    Superman and you opened the door”), where would the vacuum go?

    Issue the third: What assurance is there, that when the chamber is vented back
    to full atmosphere, there is an adequate percentage of oxygen in the chamber?
    Hint: It is a big, big, big mistake here to acknowledge here that the laws of
    statistical gas dynamics allow for one chance in 10^10^17 (no typo) that the
    chamber will spontaneously refill with a sufficiently oxygen-poor atmosphere
    to preclude respiration.

    Issue the forth, and so help me God I am not making this up, again an exact
    Safety Nazi quote, “How can you be sure there won’t be vacuum pockets left
    in the chamber, that someone could accidentally stick their head into?”

    And, coupled with issue #2, there could be deadly vacuum pockets floating
    around the lab! Aieeee!!!! Run for your lives!

    It only took three weeks to find someone with the common sense and the real
    authority to overrule the Safety Nazis on this one, and the SNs still take
    offense if anyone brings it up in their presence.

    Vacuum pockets.
    ============

    (Yes, the possibility of getting trapped in a chamber like that is a Real Safety Hazard. But… Vacuum pockets.)

    o Insulation. You might be interested in http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Cold_Houses/Cold_Houses.html which is a brief look (with math) at the economics of heating and insulation.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

The forum ‘General Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.