Home › Forums › General Chat › Random thoughts on DYI
This topic contains 0 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by aonurag 14 years, 6 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 21, 2009 at 13:59 #9791
o DYI isn’t just a British thing. In fact, it’s so much a US thing that I’m a bit surprised to hear that it’s also a British thing.
o In the US, the DYI gods seem less demanding of blood sacrifices, possibly because we placate them with many large temples (aka “hardware stores” and “home improvement stores.”)
o “Every project requires at least three trips to the hardware store” is an old piece of wisdom.
o Many years as a working research chemist has given me a heightened but also warped sense of the hazards. Sounds like you have the same thing from your physics work. Yes, a good Safety Officer is priceless, and a bad one is priceless in a different way.
=== story floating around the internet ===
Oh, boy.Now I have to explain the absolute Greatest Moment in Wacked Out Real Science.
Couple years ago, some people I worked with finally completed a long-delayed
project to build a very large vacuum chamber for testing plasma thrusters and
other advanced spacecraft propulsion systems. Not the biggest in the business,
but maybe top ten nationwide. Big enough to walk around inside, at any rate,
which is the important point.Important, because in order to go operational it needed the approval of the
local Safety Nazis. You know the type. They have a checklist, nay, a whole
handbook of checklists, one of which involves Confined Spaces. Big enough
to walk around in? Check. Airtight? Check. Can be filled with asphyxiant
gas? Well, the MSDS for “Vacuum” apparently lists it as an “asphyxiant”, so
check. It’s a Confined Space, and so the Confined Space checklist must be
implemented.Issue the first: How do they make certain nobody can accidentally walk in while
the chamber is full of that deadly asphyxiant, “vacuum”? No, the fifty *tons*
of force holding the door closed, is not an acceptable answer.Issue the second: When the chamber is vented back to full atmospheric pressure,
where does the vacuum go? If the chamber were accidentally vented by opening
the door (see above, and note exact Safety Nazi quote, “OK, say if you were
Superman and you opened the door”), where would the vacuum go?Issue the third: What assurance is there, that when the chamber is vented back
to full atmosphere, there is an adequate percentage of oxygen in the chamber?
Hint: It is a big, big, big mistake here to acknowledge here that the laws of
statistical gas dynamics allow for one chance in 10^10^17 (no typo) that the
chamber will spontaneously refill with a sufficiently oxygen-poor atmosphere
to preclude respiration.Issue the forth, and so help me God I am not making this up, again an exact
Safety Nazi quote, “How can you be sure there won’t be vacuum pockets left
in the chamber, that someone could accidentally stick their head into?”And, coupled with issue #2, there could be deadly vacuum pockets floating
around the lab! Aieeee!!!! Run for your lives!It only took three weeks to find someone with the common sense and the real
authority to overrule the Safety Nazis on this one, and the SNs still take
offense if anyone brings it up in their presence.Vacuum pockets.
============(Yes, the possibility of getting trapped in a chamber like that is a Real Safety Hazard. But… Vacuum pockets.)
o Insulation. You might be interested in http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Cold_Houses/Cold_Houses.html which is a brief look (with math) at the economics of heating and insulation.
-
AuthorPosts
The forum ‘General Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.