Category Archives: HywelPhillips.com

Models and Prejudice

Hi All,

I’m afraid I’m writing this blog post because I’m cross. I’m cross because of a particular prejudice I observe entrenched deep in people’s attitudes which I see all too often in the attitudes people (men and women) have about nude models.

I encounter this second-hand because I’m married to a nude model, and work with and know a lot of other models.

It is time society grew up and allowed everyone to have a sexual identity without prejudicial judgements being made about that person in other spheres of life. The prejudice exists in many forms, but the one against women seems to be particularly vicious and widespread.

The most pernicious manifestation is that a woman displaying a sexual identity (either her own, or one of a character she is portraying in photos/movies) is “besmirched”, forever after damaged goods who should be ashamed of herself for what she’s done and who isn’t really fit to exist in “decent” society thereafter.

Seriously, FUCK THAT.

I hear the echoes of this attitude endlessly in reported conversations with photographers, friends, family and worst of all in the models’ own attitudes to some of their work, worrying that it has made them “dirty” and not worthy of having a happy and normal family life. No-one should be made to feel that way about themselves.

Sex and sexuality is a lovely facet of human existence. Sex is natural. 99%+ of us are the product of a sexual union between two parents who had sex to have us.

Our bodies have evolved around sex, and some of these attitudes probably stem from our “nature red in tooth and claw” history where wars were fought for control of females of reproductive age. We pay lip service to sexual equality, but there’s a deep reservoir of cultural prejudice to drain before we really mean it.

We have free will, we can think, and we can improve our moral codes to be fair. We’ve abolished slavery throughout most of the world, we’ve tackled the most egregious sexual and racial discrimination so at least the law codifies freedom rather than inequality.

It is time we tackled the “madonna or whore” prejudice, too.

Manifestation 1: No sluts for adverts
There is nothing about advertising shampoo, digestive biscuits, sofas, dresses or shoes that requires that the person so doing be celibate. Many adults who use those products will have sex. Sometimes even on the sofa or after a night out wearing the dress and shoes. So why is the girl who appears in the adverts not also allowed to appear nude for other jobs? The skills needed to make yourself look great are highly transferrable between adverts and nude modelling.

Why should this embarrass the company who makes digestive biscuits? It is hypocrisy- these companies all use pretty young women of fertile age to advertise their products, so what’s wrong with said women also modelling nude or in bondage or stripping off some sexy lingerie or whatever else she wants to do? You don’t see digestive biscuits advertised by and for nuns and eunuchs only, do you? This prejudice needs to be challenged.

Manifestation 2: Level Pushing
One might have imagined that the modelling industry would be better than society in general. After all, half the people involved are the models themselves. One might think that photographers would soon learn that you can’t make value judgements about people depending on how naked they get; models who show more skin are as nice and as nasty, on average, as anyone else. Most professionals quickly figure that out. But not all photographers do.

Instead we get a the “level pushing slut shaming and defilement” ritual which seems to be the main reason some shit-bags do photography in the first place. They always seem to have tracked down the most explicit photos showing the maximum amount of detail of a girl’s genitals. They always push models to shoot more explicit work than they advertise as being happy with, then judge them as a dirty slut if they do (and tell everyone else about it. Ohh, you know Model Mary Mary? Ooooh, she worked to open leg you know, oooh, look at these I’ve printed out…)

It’s utterly reprehensible and pathetic at the same time. If these people genuinely wanted to shoot good work of a certain level of explicitness, they’d book one of the many models who are delighted to do that. They wouldn’t harass girls who clearly DON’T want to shoot work like that, so they can feel a bit like they’ve had sex with her, boast about it, and claim that it wasn’t anything to do with them as secretly the girl was a slut all along so she deserves it. It says nothing at all about the model. It speaks volumes about the arsehole pushing the levels, though.

Manifestation 3: I can’t tell my family
I’m very sad that lots of people who do beautiful work including a sexual element are too terrified of the revelation to tell anyone they know in “normal” life about it. This affects website producers, photographers and models too.

People shouldn’t have to fear being ostracised because they have a sexual identity or because they’re sufficiently intelligent and talented to be able to portray characters with a sexual identity on film.

I know I’m lucky. I was brought up in a very liberal, atheist, secular, non-sexist, scientific and loving family, in a particularly liberal time. My Mum worked in technical industries, was sufficiently bolshy to challenge her employer when she was given inadequately challenging work to do, got her solo pilot’s licence, read Pure Maths at University as a mature student for a challenge, and became a computer program troubleshooter. My Dad is equally accomplished in his fields too. The idea that there was anything that my Mum shouldn’t be allowed to do because she was a woman never occurred to me.

(Parenthetically, I think it is only OK to run a website portraying female submissive bondage because I live in a society where bondage can just be a sexual game for fun, not a daily fact of life enshrined in law for more than 50% of the population).

I’ve never been ostracised or had any worry that I would be and as a result I’ve been able to be completely open about what I do. And because I live in a nice intelligensia liberal bubble, I’ve never encountered a bad reaction that lasted much past the first enthusiastic conversation and proudly showing off some of my work.

Everyone should be able to ask that amount of respect from their friends, families and employers- whatever field they work in. It is time people got over the attitude that sex is sinful. Disowning one of your children because they are gay is starting to be seen as despicable. Disowning them or judging them because they are a nude model should be, too. It is a failure of the prejudiced people, not of the model.

I think it is especially tricky for models because I have observed that many of them have a fluid, hazy self-image. This was the biggest surprise to me about the industry. I assumed models would have to be really confident, especially about their looks. I’m sure some are, but a more common pattern seems to be that their self-image is reliant upon and largely defined by the opinions of others.

I conjecture that this may be an asset in the job for models (and actors, too). Maybe it is easier to step into character for a wide variety of roles if you aren’t fighting a very strong internal image of yourself? But it also means that the disapproval of others can be even more devastating than usual.

Perhaps this is one reason why not so many models boldly proclaim their identity and occupation as a skilled and demanding and artistic job, something of which one should be proud?

Manifestation 4: New boyfriend
Oh, there’s a whole blog post about models and boyfriends to be done. I want to highlight one particular instinct which manifests in a nice way, a nasty way and a very nasty way.

The Nice Way
To an outsider, the modelling industry seems pretty scary. If you’ve never been to a nude photoshoot, it is easy for the imagination to run riot and imagine orgies of sex, drugs and rock-n-roll. As with all jobs, the reality is very different, and very mundane. Photographers worry about lights, f-stops, shutter speeds, ISO, white balance, composition, making sure the model is safe, warm enough… one’s mind is entirely too occupied to get turned on, despite the presence of a naked girl. It soon becomes unremarkable. And the model is likewise concerned with where the key light is, which way to turn her body, how much to arch her back, pointing her toes, making nice shapes, relaxing her hands, the expression on her face, what the character in the story might be doing, where the camera is, holding the pose long enough to get the shot, then knowing where she is going to go next.

You couldn’t imagine a less sexy way to look at naked women. The eroticism of the final product is the result of an awful lot of fiddly detail work, not a crime of passion. It is like sewing a dress for a celebrity to wear on the red carpet to the Oscars. The end result is a very glamourous thing, but I assure you that the person sewing the zip in in a workshop is not experiencing the glamour of the ceremony while they do it.

It is natural to be interested, concerned and possibly a bit intimidated if you suddenly start going out with someone in the industry. In the same was it is natural to be interested and concerned if you start going out with someone who works in a nuclear power plant. But you’ll soon learn that they don’t come home radioactive. And models don’t come home having had a sexual experience.

Nice boyfriends soon learn this.

The Nasty Way
The nasty way is to bag yourself a model, then “rescue” her from that life so she can be exclusively yours. Which she likely would have been anyway- models don’t seem to be any more prone to cheating than the general population, and the good ones are too busy driving all over the country modelling to cheat on you even if they have the inclination.

Nasty boyfriends flatter themselves how big a man they are for acquiring such a high-status bit of arm candy, then immediately get wildly jealous and start laying out a hundred and one terms and conditions designed to make it impossible for her to continue in the career which made her an attractive catch in the first place. Hypocrites; these are the ones who would probably cheat given a snifter of a chance and can’t imagine that anyone wouldn’t. So the only safe place for the little woman is locked in the house.

The Really Nasty Way
The really nasty way is to be titillated by the idea of winning a model as a bit of status symbol arm candy, then pimp her out and push her to do harder and harder scenes so you can spend her money, whilst telling her that she’s lucky to have you, most men wouldn’t put up with what she does for a living. The more you can force her to feel degraded, the more you can coerce her to do, the worse she will feel about herself, and the less chance she’ll realise you are an abusive c*nt and dump your sorry arse.

I’ve met this particular model boyfriend so often he has a name: TMB (Typical Model Boyfriend). He’s a photographer (part time) and her manager, and he can get you into Mayfair or the Yorkshire Evening Post Page Three, he shows up to shoots and pesters the photographer, shouts pose instructions at the models, perves over any other models, disrupts the shoot with loud phone calls to other jobs, writes the models’ emails for her (and signs it with a sexual innuendo and a kiss-kiss). I’ve met him in several physical bodies but it is the same person inside, I swear it.

Manifestation 5: I’m not good enough, I feel dirty
Putting to one side my conjecture that models may, as a group, be more than usually sensitive to the opinions of others for their own sense of self-worth, no-one likes to be disapproved of or castigated.

The net result of the general climate of “she asked for it”, “slut shaming”, “oooh, she works to open leg”, “Can’t advertise smarties because you once showed a nipple” is that some models start to feel that they are doing something shameful.

This is a tricky thing, because they are constantly getting these little needling inputs saying that they ARE doing something shameful. It is hard to stay proud and believing that you are doing beautiful nude work in the face of all this.

And that’s the very worst thing. I’ve heard models whose body of artistic work constitutes a absolute JEWEL of which our culture should be rightly proud worrying that they feel dirty, that they don’t know if they even deserve a “nice” boyfriend (i.e. non-abusive non-arsehole) and whether they are fit to be a mother and raise children or do a “normal” job ever again.

YES, YOU ARE FIT TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT.

Be a good person, work hard, be honest and trustworthy, be an independent woman running her own business, create great art, have fun doing it, and fight the stereotypes and prejudices that say you can’t.

My attitude is to be proud about what I do, be proud of it, let people see that I am, and challenge their prejudices. I hope I’d have the courage to stick to that if the heat ever really turned on me, like it did on some of my friends when the tabloids got involved.

I hope models can too and that by doing so we can help break down the prejudices.

A vast number of people consume erotica and porn.

It is only OK to do so if you treat the people who make it and appear in it with respect and let them feel good about the work they’ve done for you to enjoy.

Porn, Batman, Twilight, Gladiator and Fifty Shades of Grey

Slavegirls. Do you care who these girls are?

Do you care who these slavegirls are?

Compelling Viewing in Movies and Porn

In the last few days I’ve watched some interesting movies. Some good (Gladiator, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises) some stinkers (Robin Hood, Prometheus).

I’ve been wondering why a team who can produce something as bombastic and yet sublime as Gladiator can go on to make such unsatisfying fare as Robin Hood and Prometheus, and what is it that makes Christopher Nolan’s work so excellent. What lessons can I learn for my lowest of low budget erotic films?

If you’re a regular visitor you’ll know that I have a fetish for image quality in my own work. This is a long standing quest from my earliest photos on toy cameras, a desire for stuff to look sharp and crisp and cool and colourful and perfect.

It’s necessary therefore for me to recognise that the importance of how good it looks comes a long way down the list of necessary qualities a movie must have. I think the most important elements are:

  1. What happens. If nothing happens, you have no movie. The events that unfold have to be interesting and compelling to watch. We have to hunger to find out what happens.
  2. Who it happens to. We have to care about the people in the movie. For mainstream movies, personally, I need someone to root for. There has to be a connection.
  3. That it makes internal sense. Not so much in petty continuity; all movie makers make mistakes (e.g. the clock on the wall shows the wrong time. Who cares?). I mean in terms of coherence. Once you’ve established a character to be painfully honest, they shouldn’t start expeditiously telling whoppers a few scenes later unless they’ve undergone a major life changing experience.
  4. That the rest of the movie making doesn’t obscure the top three. As long as you can follow the big three elements unfolding- you can see and hear what’s going on clearly enough- anything else is icing on the cake.

We can quibble over the relative importance of these. I’m sure you can think of a movie with characters we really care about that are fun despite them not making a great deal of sense, or where the awesomeness of the plot carries you over the fact that the characters are all dicks. I think a truly great movie has the big three ingredients polished to perfection, and the rest of the art, craft and spectacle of the movie merely serves to present the top three elements to you in as glorious a way as possible. If the spectacle gets in the way of the core ingredients, the film will be rubbish however big the budget.

Following Perfection: Even The Masters Make Mistakes

Gladiator and The Dark Knight are two films which rise above their genres to achieve perfection. Both managed to turn their potentially unlikeable lead characters- a billionaire
playboy turned violent vigilante, and an army general who participates with exhilaration in bloody battle- into nuanced real-seeming people we felt for. Not just the leads, but the support cast whose lives were touched by the main story (Rachel Dawes, Alfred, Jim Gordon, Proximo, Lucilla, Jubo). They were also elevated by two of cinema’s most intelligent, interesting and peculiarly plausible villains, in the Joker and Commodus.

Part of the magic was provided by the actors. One of the reasons movie stars are movie stars is that they bring that connection to the screen. Joaquin Phoenix, Heath Ledger, Christian Bale, Russell Crowe and the others gave stunning performances. Indeed, possibly career-defining performances. And there’s a clue- the actors can’t do it alone. They need the script to give them the what happens and the internal sense. Only then can they grab our emotions and run with them.

It is interesting what films the directors of those two films did afterwards. How do you follow perfection? Most particularly, how do you follow perfection when you revisit the same ground? Ridley Scott revisited the scenes of earlier triumphs with Robin Hood (another historical epic with Russell Crowe) and Prometheus (a prequel to a much earlier perfect movie, Alien). Christopher Nolan had the third film in his Batman trilogy to deal with. How did they do?

With all due respect to Ridley Scott and the teams of talented people who worked on the films, I’m afraid I didn’t like your movies. I thought they were stinkers. And it begs the question- how can a team capable of producing something a great as Gladiator make a movie as ragged and incoherent as Robin Hood?

My opinion? Bad script.

The story was rambling at best, with the most interesting element strangled of oxygen and buried under the weight of set-up and pointless spectacle. The interesting story? An imposter comes home from the crusades to Marion’s lands and bed, and she falls in love with him anyway. The film could have started an hour in and concentrated on that plot-line, taking all the tedious mucking about at the crusades as read. I think that would have transformed the movie for the better.

The characters were not made engaging enough: they were mostly indistinguishable boozy squaddies or indistinguishable arrogant posh knights.

The one character who really stood out (Marion) was immediately undermined as the plot demands temporarily rendered her incapable of rescuing a stuck pig without help from manly he-man Robin. Despite all her previous resourcefulness she didn’t think to order manly he-man to grab a rope and pull her out, which would have let him be manly whilst keeping her resourcefulness intact.

The film was a stinker because the script failed to provide interesting events, sympathetic characters, and lacked self-consistency in dozens of similar, character-undermining ways.

Dark Knight Rises? I thought that was a very good film. I don’t think it reaches the heights of Dark Knight, but really- how could it? Wisely, the things which Christopher Nolan concentrated on were an engaging story, engaging characters and making sure that everyone got satisfying closure without doing violence to self-consistency. If anything, the spectacle was turned down from the last one, despite the events being bigger in scale.

What Christopher Nolan did was concentrate on the essentials. He tried to find another great story to tell, not another spectacular movie to make. I’d love to be able to make a film that good!

Lessons for Erotica

Can we learn from this, even producing tiny budget erotica? Are the same elements are important? I think the rules apply, but not always in the most obvious of ways.

Here’s my take. In the field we primarily work in, female-sub BDSM, you need a pretty girl (rule 2), and BDSM stuff needs to happen to her (rule 1), and you need to be able to see and hear it (rule 4), and her reactions should be consistent with the sort of storyline you are filming (rule 3). Every website producer will tell you that content is king. Nothing matters if the material isn’t compelling viewing.

Characters

In erotica, instead of someone to root for, I personally need someone to fancy. As a heterosexual man, that means a pretty girl. Ariel says that she can imagine herself being in the position of the sub even if the sub is male, so a scene where a man is heroically resisting interrogation could be hot for her by transference. (She does like it to be a man being the top though, I think). If there is any transference for me, I’ll imagine myself in the position of the top, or more likely as the top’s boss watching the scene unfold. I know Pandora Blake is a big advocate of female/spankee gaze i.e. having a sexy dom, something which is at best irrelevant to me, maybe even counter-productive since I don’t want to feel annoyed and intimidated by watching an oh-so-perfect-chisel-chin-dom strutting about the place.

So there’s interesting difference number one: you may need different things for different parts of your audience, to an even greater extent than the mainstream.

Do I need to root for a character in the same way as I do in a mainstream movie? I don’t think I do. I don’t need to root for the dom- the dom could be the cackling cartoon baddy as long as he does appropriately bad things to the sub (and doesn’t do anything inappropriately bad- un-hygenic butt plugs being licked clean squick me, even in fantasy).

And rooting for the sub might be counter-productive since I’m definitely going to want bad things to happen to her (rule 1: that’s why I’m watching a female sub BDSM movie in the first place).

In our films we’ve been trying to expand on the characterisation a bit. I don’t know if this is the right thing to do. It may be that finding out more about the characters might hinder the hotness- hotness is in the mind of the beholder. If you are a damsel-in-distress fan, you might want the sub to be innocent. Someone else might like her to be an ice queen who has done bad stuff and might deserve it. Another viewer might want her to be loving it. If we do too much storytelling, do we risk addressing too narrow an audience?

Should we leave the characters more enigmatic?

An enigmatic dom should let the viewer step more easily into their shoes. It certainly seems to have worked for the female leads (and their legions of female wannabes) in Twilight and (shudder) Fifty Shades of Grey.

And the perfect echo to those “step in” enigmatic doms? A superbly attractive sub, whose reactions might be sexy enough to pass for innocent fright, chagrined suffering or play-acted suffering-but-turned-on.

We’d end up with that most basic of bondage website videos- five minutes of a girl struggling in bondage, going “mmmpfh!” through the gag and not getting out, with barely a sight of any dom. Maybe that’s why that form is the most basic- it could be the most easily transferable.

Only one step removed from that is the “top-and-tail pro performer” BDSM video which is the staple of kink.com and their many imitators. In the “top” at the start of the video we meet the performers, they are excited, they are going to play out a hot BDSM scene in front of the camera. A plotless (but BDSM action filled) scene follows, “tailed” by the post-orgasmic interview where the performers say how like, totally awesome it was and how they had a great time and why, sure they’d do it again.

I must admit, if the sub is attractive to me and the BDSM action is something I want to see, I can find videos like that pretty hot.

So are we misguided in trying to stealthily add flashbacks, visual storytelling, and more overt characterisation into our movies? I honestly don’t know- one of the problems of producing your own erotica is that using it as porn becomes almost impossible. You can’t get far enough away from it to be able to view it that way.

Storyline, or just Action?

Do we also do our movies a disservice by trying to fit the hot BDSM action into a framing storyline? By trying to provide meaningful reasons for the hotness to happen, are we actually taking it out of the realm of erotica and making lame mainstream movies with a bit of bondage in them? I know that when I make a movie, I want to have it make sense and I want the story to move forward in ways that seem rational and motivated. But there doesn’t seem to be much BDSM movie erotica like that around, so I’m struggling to judge how good I’d find that as porn.

It’s the BDSM action and the girl that makes me click the buy button. A super-sexy girl getting hard bastinado and I’ll probably give it a whirl regardless of the framing storyline. However I find the monotony of top-and-tail or total lack of storyline gets stale fast, and I get bored before downloading more than a handful of videos. That’s part of the reason why I started making my own.

Satisfying Self Consistency

In a mainstream film I want the emotional high of a satisfying ending for the characters I care about, in a way which feels right and natural.

Cynics would suggest that no porn needs to have any content past about ten minutes in, as once you’ve come you don’t care what happens next. Is that true?

We’ve noticed in the stories we write for Restrained Elegance that we often have a beginning and a middle, but fade to black in place of having an end. Do we want the girl to live happily ever after? Or to fall in love with the dom? Or is it better that we leave it to the imagination, perhaps hinted at by a twist just before we fade out? Of course in bondage what always happens is that the girl gets untied, but this is definitely an anti-climax (in many senses!) We don’t particularly want to show them fucking (it just isn’t something we’re interested in filming) so where does that leave us?

So should we work on giving our characters closure? Or leave them in media res as though they dwell in a world of continuous hot BDSM sex?

Not Messing The Rest of it Up

Here at least we can be clear. Our job is to show the action clearly, with good sound, so we can participate in the film-maker’s objective of fancying the hot girl, enjoying the bad BDSM stuff that is done to her, and makes her look at her very best.

Without false modesty, this bit we now know how to do. We can improve, surely, but we’ve got to a level where we can show what we want to show on screen and make the girls look great. The question is- what should we be showing? Should we spend much longer working on the scripts before shooting, as I believe the Robin Hood crew should have?

Why I Think It Is Worth Trying

I think it is worth trying to draw from the lessons of mainstream movies, because we might end up hitting a sweet spot the way The Dark Knight and Gladiator did.

If your fantasy is the innocent damsel in distress, surely we can do a better job of a damsel-in-distress story by showing her innocence. If you want to be the evil baron who has her tortured, surely it is better to show him, and make his motivations clear. Each decision we make on the storyline and the characters can make the film better for you if that’s your thing. Sadly it might narrow the already niche audience even further, potentially excluding people who’d have enjoyed watching the hot BDSM action with the hot girl if we’d left the surroundings more enigmatic.

There is clearly a place for “context free” shorter videos of hot BDSM action. We enjoy making them as short Restrained Elegance videos, and sometimes we’ll be doing that for Elegance Studios films too.

But I hope you’ll agree that it is also worth trying to make erotic films that step beyond the context-free hot BDSM action and also tell a satisfying story where some interesting other stuff happens to characters you want to watch as well as just the BDSM. It doesn’t need to take up much screen time if we are smart about it. Doing that without compromising on the hotness is a key objective for Elegance Studio films at the moment (as we did in Slave Auction, for example). But are we right to even try?

I’d very much like to know what characters, action and story-lines you’d enjoy watching, or whether you think they are an annoying distraction.

Welcome to the new-look blog!

Welcome to my new-look blog!

As Apple have decided to kill off the hosting, comments and web design software for my old blog (nice one, Apple!) I’ve decided to take the opportunity to move to something more professional. Hence, the new-look blog and website.

I’ve also decided to rationalise our blogs by merging the HywelPhillips.com and EleganceStudios.com blogs. New EleganceStudios.com blog announcements will now appear here. I’ve imported the old ES blog posts, but the old HywelPhillips ones can’t be handled so easily. You can find an archive of those older essays in the “Archives from old blog site” link on the left.

Cheers, Hywel

 


Ariel Anderssen as a bound mermaid

Ariel Anderssen as a bound mermaid