Category Archives: British Fetish Film Festival

Bondage Scripts

For the last week I’ve been on creative retreat, taking time out from the day-to-day running of the websites. It sounds pompous but it is hard to concentrate on writing whilst editing films, processing photos and answering emails. Some dedicated time was in order.

I want to figure out how to make our films better. For the bondage and fetish work specifically, I want to make the films more intense, more compelling, better stories (and hotter, too).

I also want to make some movies with fetish elements that will appeal to a wider audience.

Firstly, to send to the British Fetish Film Festival. It was clear from the producers’ screening that the stronger the story progression, the more compelling the film.

Secondly, I’d like to make a film showing BDSM as we think it is: positive and fun, one part of a fulfilling sex life if it happens to be your kink, not something to be scared of. The portrayal in mainstream media is lamentable- even laudable ones like Secretary have to have a self-harming, slightly broken sub and a dom with so many personal issues he can hardly function.

I’d like to make films with stronger story lines for Elegance Studios and sometimes RE and SS, too.
(Only sometimes. Not every film needs a big old wodge of story. There’s nothing wrong with short, sharp, sexy BDSM videos with lots of hot action and we’ll still be making plenty of those, and improving the quality and the impact of those too.)

I think the element that’s most lacking in our longer storytelling efforts to date has been the ending. We do OK at beginnings- we’re quite practiced at sketching characters and situations quickly without a ton of exposition. We do good middle sections- that’s where all the sexy stuff and the fun stuff happens. We just usually tail off with a fade to black or a “girl gets too tired to struggle” instead of a proper ending.

The obvious ending for bondage is either the tied up person gets untied (which is not very hot to see) or the characters have sex (which would turn into hardcore porn, which we don’t want to make). So we need to figure out how to make impactful endings which bring the film to an emotional, satisfying conclusion without seeming lame or a let down.

The tool I most need to do that is a script, a proper screenplay.

We’ve been getting closer and closer to that with the shoot plans for our longer and more complex films anyway, but so far we’ve stopped short. We’ve worked from shot lists, shot lists plus a few storyboards, and written essays which are plans for screenplays but with the dialogue to be improvised on set. And again, that’s a great way to work for some things.

I’ve concluded already this week that I can’t write comedy screenplays, but comedy comes about naturally with improvisation. So my bondage comedy ideas are going to be done in the “story plus improv” mode.

What I’m really settling down to do now is to flesh out some ideas into proper, fully-scripted format so we can shoot them that way. I think the advantage will be that with tighter control, you can plot more tightly. And you need the end written, so you have to think about it before you start shooting. That lets you feed the set-up more tightly so that the beginning leads inexorably towards the emotionally satisfying ending.

I set myself several challenges.

Stage one was to come up with ten log lines. A log line is a one or two sentence summary of what the film is about, to try to explain why it is a good idea and why I would want to make it (and hopefully why you will want to watch it!) I decided to tweet mine, so they have a 140 character limit, which is STRICT.

Tick: here are the ones I came up with

  1. Too old & too tall, lifestyle BDSMer Audrey must defeat the horrid fashion models to be crowned million-pound face of metal bondage fashion
  2. Wylie Coyoye Bondage. Incompetent kidnapper keeps trying to grab her victim with bondage traps but keeps trapping herself in bondage instead
  3. Autocratic ruler tries to be good man. Only indulgence- sadistic fantasies with captive slavegirls. Until he meets true love among slaves…
  4. Good time girl provides service: perfect embodiment of any fantasy. Kidnapped by mob pimps, she must escape; her only client is her husband!
  5. Some day my prince will come. But when he does, he’s an arse- I think I’ll stay with kinky evil captor.
  6. Journalist mistakenly invited to BDSM scene. She goes, intending exposé, finds own fulfillment. Now she must battle tabloid exposé herself
  7. Nymphomaniac Zombies. Contagion turns young women into sex fiends. Capture and bondage the only option until a cure is found!
  8. Dating Epic Fail. Ditzy girl installs Bad Idea Bear app to make all date decisions for her. Ensuing adventures lead her to sub identity BDSM
  9. Ditzy blonde intern must run business when boss breaks his leg. Only trouble: business is running bondage website!
  10. Service orientated sub girl must learn the difference between affection and abuse to escape the prison of “I don’t deserve anything better”

Some of these feel like short films for RE, some longer ones for ES, some mainstream-ish, some not, one or two may even be worth considering at feature length.

The intern one I had a go at, and discovered I couldn’t script funny dialogue, didn’t know where to start. But I can see that as soon as I get the right people on set, comedy will ensue. So that one has become a “standard” shoot plan.

The fashion world one I’ve turned into a short script. Two drafts so far. It’ll need tuning, but I quite like it. It feels satisfying.

The Good Time Girl one had the strongest number of hot mental images associated with it, so despite the fact that no-one on twitter liked it, and that I thought the logline was poor, I’ve written a short script for that one too. It’ll need revisions.

I’ve made quite a few notes on several of the others.

Which ones sound most interesting to you?

“More cinematic” is not “better”. But it is difficult.

I should say that there’s nothing inherently superior about “more cinematic”. It is one of the standard styles in which moving pictures are presented, and it suits some stories very well.

Other styles suit other stories.

Hand-held crash zooms looks like a newsreel live broadcast: ideal for disaster movies and alien invasions.

I love music videos and the the “MTV” style – lots of jump cuts, extensive slowmo. It works for a story that can be crammed into a three minute music track. That’s not “better” than the “Hollywood blockbuster” style, it is just different.

There is a recognisable “website video” style that has come about through practical considerations of how we shoot. As did all the other styles, incidentally.

For example, smooth camera movies came about because movie cameras used to weigh a ton, and you couldn’t shoot shaky-cam with them if you tried. The mass of the camera would have defeated you. And you couldn’t shoot your home movies on them, because they wouldn’t fit in your house. When light cameras came along, they were also cheap- people used them for home movies and newsreels. Which is why we associate shaky-cam with home movies or news footage, and large crane and dolly movies with big budget films.

The website video style is usually two cameras, one wide angle, one getting detail shots, cutting between the cameras like a live mixer on a live TV broadcast. Long rolling takes, exposition largely done through dialogue, fairly brightly lit, continuity edit.

It conveys some stories very well: as people have commented on my previous post, it has a feeling of reality and that the action is all happening in real time as we watch. So if you are capturing a BDSM scene bring played out “as live”, it’s just the ticket. Scenes shot this way aren’t actually any more “real” than scene shot in a different style. There’s a real girl, tied up with real rope, whatever style we happen to be shooting.

Sorry to disillusion anyone, but the actress’ “model character” is almost always a role, just as much as if she’s playing a captured spy. Most models use a stage name, and that stage name is also the character they play by default on screen.

She might be more practiced at the role, and the style has associations which we take to mean “this is really happening to someone”, so it might be easier to suspend disbelief. But I assure you that nipple clamps hurt whether you shoot with two cameras one rolling take, or one camera and cinematic angles and camera moves and storyline development. So in the same way that the cinematic style isn’t “better”, the website style isn’t “more real”.

They just have different connotations and suit different stories.

The website style isn’t an especially glamorous style, for the same reason that super-8 handheld film footage isn’t an especially glamorous style.

If you want your captured spy to look like a Bond girl, rather than a girl in a house in suburbia, you might want to pinch style elements from the Bond films. If you want your maidens carried off by Vikings, you’d do well to look at historical epics.

We have particular associations of grandeur, drama and style associated with the Hollywood big-movie style. Many reasons for that, not least of which is that it is a damned expensive way to make films!

Since that’s a look and feel that appeals to me, I want to pinch elements of the cinematic style for SOME of our website videos- the ones whose story suits the style. In doing so, I don’t think the films are inherent better. One can make boring stories in a cinematic style and they’ll still be terrible. But if one do want to borrow some of Hollywood’s glamour (which with a website calling itself Restrained Elegance, I’d like to), the cinematic style might be a very good match.

Unfortunately, it is difficult to achieve. That’s because the way it is done usually involves big budgets, big sets, big crews, lots of equipment, and even bigger budgets. And did I mention big budgets? Not just big in a “ten times what we spend on a film” sort of way. Big in a MILLION times what we spend on a film sort of way.

It isn’t better.

But objectively, it IS more difficult to achieve.

That gives it a glamour and a cachet and is why it has a mystic fascination for many low budget film-makers.

Hywel

Organizing The Film Festival

Hi All,

Big step forward today for the film festival: we talked to the licensing department at our local council.

The chap we met was nice, non-judgmental and informative. We now have a better idea of the likely issues and the potential sticking points for the council on holding the festival locally.

We are preparing a detailed event proposal to submit to them, along with a DVD of films submitted to the zeroth festival.

Then they can give us their considered legal opinion on whether they would be happy to have the event held here, what form it should take and what conditions they might require. Once we have approval in principle from them we can approach venues (indeed they may be able to put us in touch with suitable venues).

We’ll be asking other producers for their comments on our draft proposal at the zeroth festival. Here is a bullet-point outline of the event we think we will propose, if anyone has any suggestions please do let us know!

Motivations

  • An event to bring together film-makers, academics and film aficionados to watch and discuss films portraying alternative sexual identities, fetishes and fetish lifestyles.
  • Mainstream media portrayals of fetishists and fetish lifestyles are usually made by outsiders (50 shades of grey…). Are their portrayals fair, realistic, accurate? Or are they judgmental, prejudiced, unfair?
  • The availability of affordable high quality digital cameras is revolutionizing movie making. Fetishists can now easily make films themselves.
  • What is it like to have a particular fetish? What does it feel like from the inside if that is a big part of your life? How do you integrate your fetish into your life in a good and healthy way?
  • We believe the best way to answer these questions is to look at the films we make ourselves, as people who share the fetish. We want to provide a British event to watch and discuss these films in a constructive, non-judgemental atmosphere.
  • The last thing we want is drunken louts jeering or laughing at the screen, and we are constructing the event accordingly.
  • As film-makers we also want to provide a motivation (and deadline!) for making and finishing films.
  • We also want to stimulate skill exchanges with other film-makers. We know we are a long way short of the budget and hence technical polish of Hollywood- but we have a lot of freedom that they don’t have, too. Maybe by sharing expertise we can make better films next year. We’d like to have as many film-makers attend as possible.

Event Specifics

  • Held in the daytime, at a weekend, maybe Saturday 12 noon to 6 pm. We think this will allow more film-makers to come, and avoid any concerns the council might have had about late-night pron events with drunken fetishists spilling out onto the streets at 3 am.
  • Held in a comfortable, private venue conducive to watching films and holding discussions. (E.g. a hotel conference room, private cinema, lecture hall).
  • Screening of films, interspersed with discussions led by film-makers and academics (we already have some academics interesting in attending who have offered to do this).
  • Event for circa 60-100 people.
  • Adults only, ID checks.
  • Tickets in advance rather than sales on the door.
  • Organised and advertised online. Fetlife groups and twitter and contacts via other fetish events rather than posters on lamp-posts in the local area.
  • Dress code, the specifics of which will need to be agreed with the council and the venue. We understand that people might want to dress up to attend, maybe we can have a private area within which it will be OK to dress up. Totally depends on venue.
  • If at all possible, tea and cakes 🙂

The Films

All of this hinges on what the council and their legal advisors say about the films. This could be anything from “these are all harmless, go ahead” through to “none of these are in any way acceptable”. Personally I suspect they will have specific issues with specific films… but we won’t know until they watch them and respond.

We will then work with them to produce submission guidelines for the festival, to try to ensure that people submit films which the council will be happy with us screening.

Exciting! We’ll keep you posted!

Hywel & Ariel

Making Cinematic Videos

For the last few years we’ve been trying to make our website videos more dramatic, exciting and compelling. More like a proper movie you’d see at the cinema and less like home videos.

The problem is that the “proper” way to do this involves a large cast and crew. What the mainstream film world would consider a low budget may be our whole turnover for the year. So we can’t just adopt Hollywood or BBC practice everywhere, we have to be SMART.

I don’t for a moment pretend that we’ve got all the answers. We are way down the food chain and the learning curve from Hollywood. But I hoped other people would find it useful to hear some of the tips that have worked best for us so far. I’ll be fleshing out some of these ideas in future posts, and posting video clips to illustrate what I mean, too.

We’d love to know your experiences and what tips have worked well for you… and if you try some of our ideas, do let us know how you get on!

1) Story

Hot fetish scenes in mainstream movies are often over in a flash. Think Princess Leia in the slave-girl costume or bondage scenes in horror films. The scenes are often portrayed in a very negative light, too.

If you have the fetish, you want the movie to dwell a lot longer on those scenes. An eternally extended catching of the breath to concentrate on the bondage, the whipping, the bare feet, the domme, the satin blouse, the rubber catsuit. Sometimes the characters are vanilla, but sometimes we want to show people enjoying it as well.

The danger of the website videos we mostly produce is that we go too far away from storytelling to capture enough of the fetish action to satisfy.

Our top tip for films that are for viewing by a more general audience is to put the story back in pride of place. Our experience of viewing films with people who don’t entirely share the fetish is that a good story will carry them along and let them enjoy it almost as much as if it was their kink.

2) Characters

The most important component of storytelling is who, not what. We should care about the people on screen, at least enough to be curious to see what will happen to them.

So it is important to spend a few seconds establishing the personalities on the characters on screen, and know how we want the audience to feel about them.

3) Visual Storytelling

The most natural way to do that is through dialogue. But having each character announce their personality profile like they are on a dating site is very clunky. Similarly, there’s no need to broadcast the whole plot of the film in long swathes of improvised dialogue. A little goes a long way.

It is better to do the storytelling visually. A picture is worth a thousand words, and all that.

Suppose our leading lady is a lovable scatter-brain, nervously on her way to meet her boss. We could start with them meeting in the office and having a few minutes of talking. But we can establish their characters much more elegantly with a few shots:

  • Employee dropping her keys on the floor, says “Oh fiddly fidge!”
  • Boss taps fingers on desk. Clock behind says 9:31 am
  • Employee frantically checks phone as she rushes along. 9:35 am. Snoozed alarm goes off on phone screen “meeting with boss”.
  • Employee gets out of car, clothes dishevelled. Adjusts them using windscreen as makeshift mirror. Rushes off.
  • Door opens. Employee enters. Boss says “Ten minutes late, Miss Anderssen…”

Total running time probably 20 seconds, to tell us lots about the two characters very elegantly.

Sadly, it will take more than 20 seconds to shoot but the filmic effect is well worth it.

4) Sound

Nothing screams cheap video like bad sound.

Get the best microphone you can and put it as close to the mouth of the person speaking as you can.

There’s a lot more to it, but clean audio of dialogue and the action is the main thing.

5) Lighting

Porn, it turns out, is brightly lit. Some movies and TV shows are too (comedies, especially). So it is OK to get some lights and point them at the scene, then shoot. But we want the lighting to tell the story and serve the characters, and we want drama. We don’t want the tacky associations.

If you want it to look dramatic, you need to shape the light. The best starting point is three point lighting.

The hardest, brightest light source is the key light- that should be the main source of shadows. Try putting it up-stage of the actor for drama, and throw the shadows off-camera rather than against the back wall.

You’ll need a second, softer light to fill in the harsh shadows. That’s the fill light, usually on the opposite side of the camera from the key light.

The third is the backlight, rim light or hairlight, shone from above and behind the actor to separate them from the background and get them to “pop”. Also makes girls look very glamorous.

6) Single Camera. Shorter Takes.

When you are trying new stuff it is hard to get it right on multiple cameras. A lot of us use multiple cameras and shot in long rolling takes, cutting between angles like a live TV broadcast.

For making something more cinematic, shoot in shorter takes.

Make each shot tell you something new, reveal some new information.

Use just one camera – it focusses the mind and saves you thinking “oh the other guy will have got it”.

Look at mainstream films and count every time the shot cuts. Compare with the pace of cuts in a typical website video. Notice that pretty much every shot is there for a reason.

Movies are life with all the dull bits cut out. Fetish videos can be too- make sure enough happens through the scene to be showing new information regularly. Maybe not at the pace of a mainstream film (that’s why mainstream films only have very brief fetish scenes in them) but pick it up a bit and don’t go back to shots which are “dead” too often.

Yes, mainstream films and TV are increasingly using multiple cameras. We find it easier to figure out with just one first, then thinking about adding the second camera back in.

7) Production Design and Framing

I’ve seen films shot in beautiful houses where the characters are shot sat right in front of a plain white wall, throwing really ugly shadows everywhere. You wouldn’t know for a moment it was in a gorgeous location.

Try to show more of the world.

Shoot into corners and across rooms, not against flat walls.

Get your actors away from the walls, put them in the middle of the room. Also makes it easier to get hairlights in.

Shoot through things (open doors are good) to create a feeling of space. Have the characters move around.

Dress the edges of shots with little details that show there’s a wider world out there. For stills, you usually try to remove distractions at the edge of frames. For movies, cultivate that. Anything which helps lend an impression of depth is to be encouraged.

8) The Rodriguez List

Robert Rodriguez made his early films on micro budgets by writing his stories around a list of cool stuff he could get hold of. If you have a guitar case and a fast car, make a film about a guy who drives a fast car and carries a guitar case.

9) Open Framings and Camera movements

An open framing is a shot which only shows part of the scene (leaving “open” what else might be there).

A closed framing shows you everything about the scene- for example, a traditional master wide shot that shows everything.

Open framings build drama by asking questions. There’s a report on the table, a hand reaches in. Whose hand? It is dark, are we in an office?

If you gradually reveal the answers to these questions as the arise in the viewer’s mind, you can build drama and tension.

Showing the whole scene in a master wide kills the tension- there’s nothing more to show.

Try to build sequences of shots as questions-and-answers-and-more-questions.

Once you’ve started doing this, you’ll find you naturally want to move the camera. Start with pan and tilt, and soon you’ll be craving dolly shots and crane shots and steadicam! 🙂 (One day, if we get rich enough… but a simple dolly is inside almost everyone’s reach and is very effective if you plan your shots).

10) The camera, if you must

Given how much of a camera nerd I am, you’re probably surprised that this wasn’t number 1. That’s because it isn’t anything like as important as the first nine on my list.

Ariel shot a captivating documentary on her iPhone.

There’s plenty one can do to help create the film look (progressive scan, 24/25 fps. control your depth of field, shutter speed 1/48th or 1/50th, reduce sharpening, shoot flat with reduced contrast, grade with a film-like curve).

But it won’t do you any good if you don’t have a good story, good sound, good characters, nice lighting, good production design and good cinematography.

So only improve things on your camera as you work on the rest of your production too. They’re only one part of the equation.